Theaetetus 205 e<\/span><\/h1>\nTheaetetus<\/b><\/i>.<\/i> \u2014 Sane quidem.<\/span><\/p>\nSo<\/b><\/i><\/span>crates<\/b><\/i><\/span>. \u2014 <\/span> Sin unum aliquod et individuum est, syllaba aeque atque elementum explicationem et cognitionem fugit; eadem enim causa efficiet ut talia sint.<\/span><\/p>\nTheae<\/b><\/i><\/span>. <\/span>\u2014<\/span> Non possum aliter dicere.<\/span><\/p>\nSo<\/b><\/i>.<\/i> \u2014 Hunc ergo ne audiamus, qui dicat syllabam quidem cognosci et explicari posse, elementum vero contra.<\/span><\/p>\nTheae<\/b><\/i><\/span>. <\/span>\u2014<\/span> Minime vero, siquidem orationem sequimur.<\/span><\/p>\nTeeteto 205d (en Caracas)<\/span><\/h1>\nT<\/b><\/i>eeteto<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> Ciertamente.<\/span><\/p>\nS\u00f3crates<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> Pero si es el Todo uno e impartible, s\u00edlaba igualmente que elemento ser\u00e1n algo irracional e incognoscible, ya que la misma causa los har\u00e1 ser as\u00ed.<\/span><\/p>\nT<\/b><\/i>eet<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> Nada tengo que decir en contra.<\/span><\/p>\nS<\/b><\/i>\u00f3c<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> As\u00ed que no admitiremos se diga que la s\u00edlaba es cognoscible y decible; mas el elemento, lo contrario.<\/span><\/p>\nT<\/b><\/i>eet<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> No, pues, de fiarnos del razonamiento.<\/span><\/p>\nPerge ad sequens caput<\/p>\n
Redde ad prius caput<\/p>\n
Redde ad indicem<\/p>\n
Teeteto 205 e (en Madrid)
\n<\/span><\/h1>\nT<\/b><\/i>eeteto<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> Sin duda alguna.<\/span><\/p>\nS\u00f3crates<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> Pero si es uno y carece de partes, el compuesto carecer\u00e1 de explicaci\u00f3n y ser\u00e1 incognoscible de la misma [307] manera que el elemento. La causa que los hace ser de estanaturaleza es, en efecto, la misma.<\/span><\/p>\nTEET<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> No tengo nada que objetar.<\/span><\/p>\nS\u00d3C<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> Por consiguiente, no dejemos a nadie decir que el compuesto es cognoscible y expresable, si afirma del elemento lo contrario.<\/span><\/p>\nTEET<\/b><\/i>. \u2014<\/span> Si nos convence este razonamiento, desde luego que no.<\/span><\/p>\nPerge ad sequens caput<\/p>\n
Redde ad prius caput<\/p>\n
Redde ad indicem<\/p>\n
Colloquia in Atrio<\/span><\/h1>\n\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"wiki_cats":[],"wiki_tags":[],"class_list":["post-2948","yada_wiki","type-yada_wiki","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yada_wiki\/2948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yada_wiki"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/yada_wiki"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2948"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yada_wiki\/2948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5345,"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yada_wiki\/2948\/revisions\/5345"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"wiki_cats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/wiki_cats?post=2948"},{"taxonomy":"wiki_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/wiki_tags?post=2948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}