Parte de:<\/span><\/p>\n \u00bfQu\u00e9 es la Filosof\u00eda Pol\u00edtica? \/ III. Las soluciones Modernas<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Por Le\u014dnardus Str\u016bthi\u014d<\/span><\/p>\n\n One might say that Rousseau\u2019s doctrine of the general will is a juridical, not a moral doctrine, and that the law is necessarily more lax than morality. One might illustrate this distinction by referring to Kant who declared in his moral teaching that every lie, the saying of any untruth, is immoral, whereas he declared in his juridical teaching that the right of freedom of speech is as much the right to <\/span>lie<\/span> as the right to say the truth.<\/span> But one may very well wonder whether the separation of law and morality of which German legal philosophy was so proud, is in itself a sound suggestion. Above all, the moral teaching of Rousseau does not dispose of the difficulty indicated. The place occupied in his juridical teaching by the right of self preservation is occupied in his moral teaching by the right or duty of self legislation.<\/span> \u201cMaterial\u201d ethics gives way to \u201cformal\u201d ethics with the result that it becomes impossible ever to establish clear substantive principles and that one is compelled to borrow substantive principles from the \u201cgeneral will\u201d or from what came to be called History.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Next paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n Previous paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n Podr\u00edamos decir que la doctrina de Rousseau sobre la voluntad general es una doctrina jur\u00eddica, no una doctrina pol\u00edtica, y que la ley es necesariamente m\u00e1s laxa que la moralidad. Se podr\u00eda ilustrar esta distinci\u00f3n <\/span>apelando a Kant quien en su su doctrina moral declar\u00f3 que toda mentira, la declaraci\u00f3n de cualquier falsedad, es inmoral, mientras que en su doctrina jur\u00eddica afirm\u00f3 que el derecho de la libertad de expresi\u00f3n es tanto el derecho a mentir como el derecho a decir la verdad.<\/span> Ser\u00eda l\u00edcito preguntarnos <\/span>si <\/span>la distinci\u00f3n <\/span>entre la ley y la moralidad, de la que la filosof\u00eda del derecho alemana estaba tan orgullosa, es en s\u00ed misma una sugerencia sensata. <\/span>Por encima de todo, <\/span>la doctrina moral de Rousseau no resuelve la dificultad antes mencionada. El lugar que ocupa en su doctrina jur\u00eddica el derecho a la autoconservaci\u00f3n, en su doctrina moral es ocupado por el derecho o deber de auto legislaci\u00f3n.<\/span> La \u00e9tica <\/span>\u00ab<\/span>material<\/span>\u00bb<\/span> da paso a la \u00e9tica <\/span>\u00ab<\/span>formal<\/span>\u00bb<\/span>, <\/span>dando como resultado la imposibilidad de establecer principios sustantivos y claros y, con ello, la necesidad de extraer esos principios sustantivos de la<\/span> \u00ab<\/span>voluntad general<\/span>\u00bb<\/span> o de lo que <\/span>se denominar\u00e1<\/span> Historia.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Siguiente p\u00e1rrafo<\/a><\/p>\n P\u00e1rrafo anterior<\/a><\/p>\n Ir al inicio de esta entrada<\/a><\/p>\nLe<\/span>\u014d<\/span>nard<\/span>\u012b<\/span> Str\u016bt<\/span>h<\/span>i<\/span>\u012b<\/span> verba<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n
Hisp<\/span>\u0101<\/span>nice<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n