\u00bfQu\u00e9 es la Filosof\u00eda Pol\u00edtica? \/ III. Las soluciones Modernas<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Por Le\u014dnardus Str\u016bthi\u014d<\/span><\/p>\n\n Machiavelli\u2019<\/span>s<\/span> scheme was open to serious theoretical difficulties. The theoretical or cosmological basis of his political teaching was a kind of decayed Aristotelianism. This means that he assumed, but did not demonstrate, the untenable character of teleological natural science.<\/span> He rejected the view that man must take his bearings by virtue, by his perfection, by his natural end; but this rejection required a criticism of the notion of natural ends. <\/span>This <\/span>proof was supplied, or was thought to be supplied, by the new natura<\/span>l <\/span>science of the <\/span>17th<\/span> century.<\/span> There is a hidden kinship between Machiavelli\u2019<\/span>s <\/span>political science and the new natural science. <\/span>The <\/span>classics had taken their bearings by the normal case as distinguished from the exception; Machiavelli effects his radical change in the understanding of political things by taking his bearings by the exception, by the extreme case. As appears from Bacon, there is a close connection between Machiavelli\u2019s orientation and the notion of torturing nature, <\/span>i.e., o<\/span>f the controlled experiment.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Next paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n Previous paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n El esquema de Maquiavelo estaba expuesto a serias dificultades te\u00f3ricas. La base <\/span>teor\u00e9tica o <\/span>cosmol\u00f3gica de su doctrina pol\u00edtica era una especie de aristotelismo decadente. Esto significa que supon\u00eda \u2014<\/span>pero n<\/span>o lleg\u00f3 a demostrar\u2014 el car\u00e1cter insostenible de las ciencia natural teleol\u00f3gica. Rechaz<\/span>\u00f3<\/span> que el hombre deba <\/span>buscar orientaci\u00f3n en las coordenadas de la<\/span> virtud, <\/span>de su<\/span> perfecci\u00f3n, <\/span>o de <\/span>su fin natural; pero est<\/span>e<\/span> rechazo<\/span> exig<\/span>\u00eda un<\/span> planteamiento cr\u00edtico de la noci\u00f3n de fines naturales. <\/span>Esta prueba fue proporcionada por <\/span>\u2014o <\/span>se crey\u00f3 que fue proporcionada por<\/span>\u2014 <\/span>la nueva ciencia natural del siglo XVII<\/span>. <\/span>Existe un parentesco oculto entre la ciencia pol\u00edtica de Maquiavelo y la nueva ciencia natural. <\/span>Los cl\u00e1sicos <\/span>se <\/span>hab\u00edan <\/span>orientado prestando atenci\u00f3n a <\/span>los casos normales, frente a las excepciones; Maquiavelo <\/span>efect\u00faa su cambio radical <\/span>en el modo de entender lo pol\u00edtico <\/span>tomando orientaci\u00f3n en las coordenadas de la excepci\u00f3n, del caso extremo. Como podemos apreciar, desde Bacon, existe una cercana conexi\u00f3n entre la orientaci\u00f3n de Maquiavelo y la noci\u00f3n de naturaleza torturada, como se considera en el experimento <\/span>\u2014<\/span>cient\u00edfico<\/span>\u2014 <\/span>controlado<\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Siguiente p\u00e1rrafo<\/a><\/p>\n P\u00e1rrafo anterior<\/a><\/p>\n Ir al inicio de esta entrada<\/a><\/p>\nLe<\/span>\u014d<\/span>nard<\/span>\u012b<\/span> Str\u016bt<\/span>h<\/span>i<\/span>\u012b<\/span> verba<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/bacon_francis_2-264x300.jpg\")
Hisp<\/span>\u0101<\/span>nice<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n