Parte de:<\/span><\/p>\n \u00bfQu\u00e9 es la Filosof\u00eda Pol\u00edtica? \/ II. La soluci\u00f3n Cl\u00e1sica<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Por Le\u014dnardus Str\u016bthi\u014d<\/span><\/p>\n\n Classical political philosophy is today exposed to two very common objections, the raising of which requires neither originality nor intelligence, nor even erudition. The objections are these: <\/span>(1) <\/span>classical political philosophy is anti-democratic and hence bad; <\/span>(2)<\/span> classical political philosophy is based on classical natural philosophy or on classical cosmology, and this basis has been proven to be untrue by the success of modern natural science.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Next paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n Previous paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n La filosof\u00eda pol\u00edtica cl\u00e1sica se ve hoy expuesta a dos objeciones muy comunes cuya presentaci\u00f3n no requiere originalidad o inteligencia, ni <\/span>siquiera<\/span> erudici\u00f3n. <\/span>Las objeciones son las siguientes<\/span>: <\/span>(1)<\/span> la filosof\u00eda pol\u00edtica cl\u00e1sica es antidemocr\u00e1tica y, por tanto, mala; <\/span>(2)<\/span> la filosof\u00eda pol\u00edtica cl\u00e1sica est\u00e1 basada en la filosof\u00eda natural <\/span>o<\/span> en la cosmolog\u00eda cl\u00e1sica, <\/span>y estas bases han sido probadas como <\/span>falsas a trav\u00e9s de<\/span>l triunfo de la<\/span> ciencia natural moderna.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Siguiente p\u00e1rrafo<\/a><\/p>\n P\u00e1rrafo anterior<\/a><\/p>\n Ir al inicio de esta entrada<\/a><\/p>\nLe<\/span>\u014d<\/span>nard<\/span>\u012b<\/span> Str\u016bt<\/span>h<\/span>i<\/span>\u012b<\/span> verba<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n
Hisp<\/span>\u0101<\/span>nice<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n