\u00bfQu\u00e9 es la Filosof\u00eda Pol\u00edtica? \/ I. El problema de la Filosof\u00eda Pol\u00edtica<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Por Le\u014dnardus Str\u016bthi\u014d<\/span><\/p>\n\n By political theory, people frequently understand today <\/span>comprehensive reflections on the political<\/span> situation which lead up to the suggestion of a broad policy. Such reflections appeal in the last resort to principles accepted by public opinion or a considerable part of it; i.e., they dogmatically assume principles which can well be questioned. Works of political theory in this sense would be Pinsker\u2019s<\/a> <\/span>Auto-Emancipation<\/i><\/span><\/a> and <\/span>Herzl<\/a>\u2019s <\/span>Judenstaat<\/i><\/span><\/a>. Pinsker\u2019<\/span>s<\/span> Auto-Emancipation<\/i><\/span> carries as its motto the words: \u201cIf I am not for <\/span>myself, who <\/span>will be for me? And if not now, when?\u201d It omits the words: \u201c<\/span>And if I am <\/span>only for myself, what am I?\u201d Pinsker\u2019<\/span>s<\/span> silent rejection of the thought expressed in the omitted words is a crucial premise of the argument developed in his tract. Pinsker does not justify this rejection. For a justification, one would have to turn to the 3rd and <\/span>16<\/span>th chapters of Spinoza\u2019s <\/span>Tractatus <\/i><\/span><\/a>theologico-politicus<\/i><\/span>, <\/span>to a work of a political ph<\/span>i<\/span>losoph<\/span>er<\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Next paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n Previous paragraph<\/a><\/p>\n En nuestros d\u00edas, la gente entiende con frecuencia por<\/span> teor\u00eda pol\u00edtica las <\/span>sesudas reflexiones acerca de la<\/span> situaci\u00f3n pol\u00edtica actual, que, desembocar\u00e1n<\/span> en la <\/span>propuesta de unas pol\u00edticas en sentido amplio.<\/span>1<\/a><\/sup>Empleo el termino <\/span>\u00ab<\/span>pol\u00edticas<\/span>\u00bb <\/span>para<\/span> policy<\/i><\/span>, que remite a lo que se <\/span>\u00ab<\/span>implementa<\/span>\u00bb <\/span>desde los cargos<\/span>, <\/span>a diferencia de la pol\u00edtica,<\/span> politics<\/i><\/span>, que comprende todo tipo de actividad pol\u00edtica.<\/span><\/span> Dichas reflexiones apelan en \u00faltima instancia a los<\/span> principios aceptados por toda la opini\u00f3n p\u00fablica o por una buena parte de ella; <\/span>es decir,<\/span> asumen<\/span> dogm\u00e1ticamente principios que <\/span>bien podr\u00edan ser cuestionados<\/span>. Obras de teor\u00eda pol\u00edtica en este sentido podr\u00edan ser la <\/span>Autoemancipaci\u00f3n<\/i><\/span><\/a> de Pinsker<\/a> o el\u00a0Estado jud\u00edo<\/em><\/a> (<\/span>Judenstaat<\/i><\/span>) de <\/span>Herzl<\/span><\/a>.2<\/a><\/sup>Vide infra<\/em> Algunas Aclaraciones<\/strong><\/a>.<\/span> La <\/span>Autoemancipation<\/i><\/span> de Pinsker lleva como lema <\/span>estas palabras: <\/span>\u00ab<\/span>S<\/span>i yo no <\/span>soy para m\u00ed<\/span>, \u00bfqui\u00e9n lo <\/span>ser\u00e1<\/span>?, y si no lo <\/span>soy<\/span> ahora, \u00bfcu\u00e1ndo lo <\/span>ser<\/span>\u00e9?<\/span>\u00bb<\/span> Pero omite estas otras: <\/span>\u00ab<\/span>Y <\/span>si yo no <\/span>soy<\/span> m\u00e1s que para m\u00ed, \u00bfqu\u00e9 soy yo?<\/span>\u00bb<\/span> La silenciosa repulsi\u00f3n de Pinsker hacia el pensamiento que contienen las palabras omitidas es una premisa crucial del argumento que desarrolla en su obra. Pinsker no justifica su repulsi\u00f3n. Para encontrar una justificaci\u00f3n deber\u00edamos volver a los cap\u00edtulos 3 y 16 del <\/span>Tractatus Theologico-Politicus<\/i><\/span><\/a> de Spinoza, o sea, a la obra de un fil\u00f3sofo <\/span>pol\u00edtico<\/span>.3<\/a><\/sup>Vide infra<\/em> Algunas Aclaraciones<\/strong><\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Hoy contamos con traducci\u00f3n al castellano de estos textos labor de Antonio Hermosa C\u00f3rdoba: <\/span>PINSKER, Leo; Theodor HERZL. <\/span>Sionismo. Or\u00edgenes y textos fundacionales del Estado de Israel. Autoemancipaci\u00f3n y El Estado jud\u00edo<\/i><\/span> (<\/span>Granada: Almuzara, 2024<\/span>)<\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n A<\/span>simismo, recomendamos, para la referencia a Spinoza, la excelente traducci\u00f3n de Atilano Dom\u00ednguez: <\/span>SPINOZA, Baruch. <\/span><\/span>Tratado teol\u00f3gico-pol\u00edtico<\/i><\/span><\/span> (<\/span><\/span>Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1986<\/span><\/span>). Para mayores referencias vide nuestras Recomendaciones bibliogr\u00e1ficas<\/strong><\/a> para la presente conferencia.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Siguiente p\u00e1rrafo<\/a><\/p>\n P\u00e1rrafo anterior<\/a><\/p>\n Ir al inicio de esta entrada<\/a><\/p>\nLe<\/span>\u014d<\/span>nard<\/span>\u012b<\/span> Str\u016bt<\/span>h<\/span>i\u014dnis<\/span> verba<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/atriumphilosophicum.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pinsker-221x300.jpg\")
Hisp<\/span>\u0101<\/span>nice<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n
Algunas aclaraciones<\/span><\/h2>\n